HOME          Annotated Secondary Bibliography

     This bibliography provides a comprehensive listing of secondary works on Lady Jane Grey, as well as my own brief review and opinion of some of the more accessible modern works. Hopefully students and those interested in pursuing study or research on Lady Jane Grey will find the information useful. I have limited the list to those works that deal primarily with Jane Grey, excluding those that treat her as one in a larger group (collective biography). If I have missed a particular volume, please let me know. Modern fictional works are excluded from this bibliography, however.

American Sunday-School Union (corp. author). The Life and Death of Lady Jane Grey. Philadelphia: American      Sunday School Union, 1831.

Baldwin, Edward. Life of Lady Jane Grey and of Guildford Dudley, her husband. London: Godwin, 1824.  

Banks, John. The Innocent Usurper or, The Death of the Lady Jane Gray; a Tragedy. London: Printed for R.      Bentley, 1694.  

Bartlett, D.W. The Life of Lady Jane Grey. Philadelphia: Porter and Coates, 1886.
         This is a hagiographic or panegyric work on Jane Grey emanating from the Victorian era when women were idealized for      religious piety and personal meekness. Mr Bartlett sought to inspire young women “to imitate the character of the beautiful and      illustrious woman whose sad, yet in another sense glorious, career [the book] records.” Unlike many of its predecessors,      however, this work provides a concise overview of the entire Tudor period prior to 1550, with particular emphasis on the English      Reformation. Mr Bartlett does make some use of authentic primary sources, though like his antiquarian peers he does not reveal      where he found them.  

Chapman, Hester W. Lady Jane Grey. London: Jonathan Cape, 1962.
         Ms. Chapman’s biography of Jane Grey appeared just a few years before the modern feminist movement began. Almost      presaging that movement, Chapman notes that a modern reassessment of Jane’s life is much needed, one that focuses on the      primary sources rather than the accumulated hagiographic writing and popular mythology. Unfortunately, Chapman does not      follow up on her own suggestion. Ms. Chapman was primarily a novelist and thus lacked the training required to produce rigorous      historiography. She did nonetheless offer footnotes and cite primary source materials. Her volume is largely an edited and      partially reworded version of Richard Davey’s work of 1909, however. She does not offer anything new; nor does she depart from      the traditional portrayal despite noting the need for a reassessment of that portrayal.  

Church of England Tract Soc.; no. 11. The Life and Death of Lady Jane Grey. Bristol: J. Chilcott, 1835.  

Cook, Faith. Lady Jane Grey: Nine Day Queen of England. Darlington, UK: Evangelical Press, 2004.
         Ms. Cook’s work, like Ms. Chapman’s, is predicated on an intriguing and valid premise: that Jane Grey was more than a mere      puppet and victim. Ms. Cook does credit Jane Grey with great intelligence and a strong will, but she portrays Jane primarily as a      single-faceted individual driven solely by her religion. Jane is, for Ms. Cook, less a complex young woman living in an era of      sweeping change than a pious saint. Insufficient attention is given to Jane’s position as an aristocratic woman in a time of      changing social and gender relations. She does offer, however, a great deal of background material, particularly on the issue of      religion. But Ms. Cook, herself the daughter of missionaries, writes to serve a specific and narrow religious agenda. Her goal in      this work is to place upon Jane Grey a “crown of righteousness” and to promote the evangelical strain of Protestant theology.      Her publisher (Evangelical Press) produces only evangelical Protestant inspirational works. Ms Cook's work is better than some      recent works, but like so many before her, Ms Cook lacks training in historiographic methodology. She utilizes only a scant five      primary sources, fewer even than does Ms Plowden. She quotes frequently and at length, but seldom if ever identifies the source      from which she obtained the quotes. The book is entertaining and worth reading, but it is not "serious history."

Dargaud, Jean Marie. Histoire de Jane Grey. Paris: L. Hachette et cie., 1863.  

Davey, Richard. The Nine Days Queen: Lady Jane Grey and Her Times. London: Metheun & Co., 1909.
         This work remains, in my opinion, the best biography of Jane Grey written thus far. It is unfortunately very difficult to obtain on      account of its age. Mr. Davey was an antiquarian, or a person fascinated by the narratives and artifacts of the past. He wrote in      an era when academic history was in its infancy, but he nonetheless made some limited use of what are now standard      historiographic methodologies. Unlike his less ‘scientific’ predecessors, he usually (though not consistently) cites his      archival sources, and relies on primary source materials rather than later mythologies. He assesses his evidence critically,      differentiating between “fact” and “fiction” (though his assessments are not always correct). His work is not without its flaws,      however. Many of his more important sources are poorly or erroneously cited. His description of Jane’s physical appearance on      entering the Tower, for example, is drawn from a “Genovese archive,” with no more precise cataloguing information supplied. His      depiction of Jane Grey continues the Victorian hagiographic tradition that portrays her as a weak and submissive young woman,      in large part because Mr Davey was himself a product of the Victorian era that constructed "Woman" as an idealized form.      Despite its shortcomings, however, this work remains the definitive biography of Jane Grey and is invaluable as a starting point      for any modern student. It has laid the foundation for and been imitated, even paraphrased, by all subsequent biographers of      Jane Grey.  

Davey, Richard Parke. The Sisters of Lady Jane Grey and Their Wicked Grandfather. London: Chapman and      Hall, 1911.
        
By the same author as the above, a continuation of the "story."

Gibbons, Thomas. The Life & Death of Lady Jane Grey. London: Printed for A. Cleugh, 2nd ed., 1792.  

Godwin, William. Life of Lady Jane Grey, and of Lord Guildford Dudley, her husband. London: M.J. Godwin,      1824.  

Goodridge, Esther. Lady Jane Gray. Peacehaven: Protestants Today, 1999.  

The History of Jane Grey, Queen of England: With a Defence of her Claim to the Crown .... London: Printed and      sold by T. Wilkins, 1792.

Hodgson, Francis. Lady Jane Grey: A Tale, in Two Books, with miscellaneous poems in English and Latin. New      York: Garland Publishing, 1809, 1977.  

Howard, George. Life of Lady Jane Grey (aka Lady Jane Grey and Her Times). London: Sherwood, Neely, and      Jones, 1822.
         Howard introduces this wonderfully fanciful volume as “a series of facts, anecdotes, and documents,” but it relies far too     heavily on outright fiction as a “source” for history. Howard makes extensive use of Shakespeare’s history plays, for example, to     provide "factual” background for the era. Given the era in which he was writing, Howard can be forgiven this indiscretion. The     resulting study should never be taken as legitimate “history,” however. It must instead be treated as one small part of the     accretion of works that ultimately constructed the modern mythology of Jane Grey.  

Isham, Giles. “Queen Catherine Parr and Lady Jane Grey” in Northamptonshire Past and Present Vol. 4, No. 5,      1970/1: 293-4.  

Laird, Francis Charles. Lady Jane Grey and Her Times. London : Sherwood, Neely and Jones, 1822.
         This volume is the same as that by George Howard, above. The author(s) are one individual publishing under two names. 

Levin, Carole. “Lady Jane Grey: Protestant Queen and Martyr.” In Silent But For the Word, edited by Margaret      Patterson Hannay. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1985.  

The Life and Death of Lady Jane Grey: With Some Extracts From Her Writings. New York: N. Y. Religious Tract      Society, 1830s.  

Lindsey, John. The Tudor Pawn: The Life of the Lady Jane Grey. London, 1938.  

Luke, Mary. The Nine Days Queen: A Portrait of Lady Jane Grey. New York: William Morrow and Company,      1986.
         Mary Luke's “biography” was sold at publication as factual history. It is not. It is historical fiction. Ms. Luke, like Hester     Chapman, was principally a novelist. Throughout the book she ascribes to Jane a series of speeches, emotions, and thoughts     that are not supported or evidenced by any historical record or document. Though entertaining, the work should never be     considered a reliable account of the life of Jane Grey.  

MacArthur, Arthur. The History of Lady Jane Grey. Glen Falls, N.Y.: Glen Falls Printing Co., 1896.

Mathew, David. Lady Jane Grey: The Setting of the Reign. London: Eyre Metheun Ltd., 1972.  

More-Molyneux, J. Letters Illustrating the Reign of Queen Jane, in Archaeological Journal, 30 (1873).
         This article is in the antiquarian tradition in that it describes some “curious” artifacts of the past without offering much in the     way of contextualization or analysis. The article was written by the owner of the letters described, a member of the family that     owned Loseley Park in Surrey. He had inherited them from a More-Molyneux ancestor who had served as executor to the estate     of their original recipient. The letters remained in the possession of the More-Molyneux family until quite recently, when they were     placed on permanent load to the Surrey History Centre in Woking. The letters, commonly known as the Loseley Manuscripts,     constitute the largest single collection of documents bearing Jane’s autograph signature as Queen.  

Muriel, John St. Clair. The Tudor Pawn: The Life of the Lady Jane Grey. London: Jarrolds, 1938.  

Plowden, Alison. Lady Jane Grey and the House of Suffolk . New York: Franklin Watts, 1986 and Lady Jane      Grey: Nine Days Queen. Stroud: Sutton, 2003.
         Plowden's two works are here reviewed together as the latter is largely a re-worked version of the former. Both versions are     based very heavily on Richard Davey’s earlier work of 1909. Indeed, entire sections are little more than paraphrases of Davey’s     text, and Ms Plowden repeats many of Davey’s citational errors. Her study of Jane Grey is currently the most popular and widely     read, however. Despite a complete lack of formal training in the profession of history (she is a former script-writer and editor for     the BBC), she has forged an admirable place for herself as a writer of histories, principally biographies, for a general audience.     But because her audience is a general one, her works are largely narrative and lack analysis. Like her predecessors, Ms     Plowden again portrays Jane Grey as a victim and puppet. She apparently did not attempt to access many of the documents and     sources now readily available through various UK archives, and the result is a work that offers nothing new. Both volumes offer     an excellent and entertaining story, but in my opinion they are little more than that. They are invaluable to the beginning student     but lacking the scope and depth required for a serious historiographical study.  

Prochaska, Frank. “The Many Faces of Lady Jane Grey.” History Today 35, no.10 (October 1984): 34-40.
         Mr Prochaska offers a fascinating discussion of the many visual portrayals of Jane Grey in the twentieth century, particularly     in film. Any fan of “Hollywood history” will enjoy this article. The article pre-dates the Paramount Pictures release in 1986 of the     film "Lady Jane,” however, so that no discussion of that piece of fiction is presented, unfortunately. One wonders what Mr     Prochaska would have to say about the film....  

Sidney, Philip. “Jane the Quene”: Being Some Account of the Life and Literary Remains of Lady Jane Dudley      Commonly Called Lady Jane Grey. London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co., 1900.  

Strickland, Agnes. Lives of the Tudor and Stuart Princesses, including Lady Jane Gray and her sisters. London:      Longman Greens, 1868.
         Miss Strickland is famous for her inspirational writings on women in history. Her works were all intended primarily as models     of behavior for young women of the high-Victorian era, instructive texts on appropriate feminine deportment. As such, they     promote obedience, submission to masculine authority, religious piety, a selfless sense of duty to one’s family, etc. Miss     Strickland was perhaps more responsible than any other single individual for popularizing the image of Jane Grey as a weak and     submissive young woman of great piety and self-sacrifice. The works and her portrayal of Jane Grey are entertaining, but must be     read with a vigilant awareness of the time and place in which they were written and the social and cultural agenda that they     serve.  

Taylor, Ida A. Lady Jane Grey and Her Times. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1908.  

Taylor, James D. The Letters of Lady Jane Grey, the Nine Days Queen, 1553: Containing letters from, to, and      about Lady Jane Grey. Jefferson , N.C.: MacFarland Press, 2003.
         Mr Taylor has clearly spent a great deal of time and effort in producing this volume. Unfortunately the result is largely useless     for anything other than entertainment. It cannot in any way be called legitimate "history." The book is replete with flaws, errors,     and omissions. The result is, in my opinion, an amateurish mish-mash of authentic and fictional sources that serves only to     confuse and mislead any unsuspecting reader seeking to investigate the life and times of Lady Jane Grey.
         Mr Taylor relies very heavily, for example, on a supposed “most valuable ... collection of letters" published in 1791 by Minerva     Press. Mr Taylor seems not to have adequately assessed the origins of the “letters,” a collection tellingly entitled Lady Jane     Grey: An Historical Tale in Two Volumes. "Tale" is the most significant word here. Mr Taylor notes that the letters had been     "lost" to historians for over 200 years, until he "uncovered” the eighteenth-century book that contained them. He states that     William Lane (then owner of Minerva Press) “purchased [the letters] from an unidentified source ... possibly during the year of     1790 or 1791.” There is a good reason why the "letters" were "lost": most trained historians can and would, after only the most     basic research into their originm immediately recognize them as complete fiction. And although Mr Taylor indicates in the     conclusion to his book that he has read Dorothy Blakey’s The Minerva Press, 1790–1820 (London: Printed for the Bibliographical     Society at the University Press, Oxford, 1939). [Taylor, p. 183], he apparently failed to comprehend from it that Minerva Press     published fiction, notably “Novels, Tales, Romances, Adventures, etc.” Indeed, the “Minerva” name by 1790 synonymous with     popular fiction. An eighteenth-century critic noted, “It cannot be denied that most of the works issued by Minerva Press are ...     completely expurgated of all the higher qualities of mind.” [See Dorothy Blakey, pp. 2, 18, 26] In modern terms, books by     Minerva Press were considered, even in the late 1700s, pulp fiction, mere dime store novels.
         Mr Taylor notes that Lane “probably ... purchased the manuscript from an anonymous contributor.” That much is certainly     true. But the contributor was also without doubt the actual author of the “letters.” They constitute what is known today as an     epistolary novel. Novelists of the late eighteenth century frequently constructed their stories in the form of a series of private     letters, often using real historical figures as their protagonists. [See Godfrey F. Singer, The Epistolary Novel: Its Origin,     Development, Decline, and Residuary Influence (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1933)] Modern readers unfamiliar     with the long-dead fictional literary form can, unfortunately, be too easily led astray through failure to recognize the novelist’s     device of attributing imaginary letters to real people.
         Taylor also correctly notes Blakey’s assertion that it is not possible to conjecture who the original author of the letters     might have been. [Taylor, 183] That is because the author wished to remain anonymous. Late-eighteenth-century novelists     frequently published anonymously, owing to the negative social stigma associated at that time with being a novelist (or even a     reader of novels). The prejudice was so strong that all of the novels published by Minvera Press after 1795 were published     anonymously. [Blakey, 48] The contributor of the so-called “Lane Letters” is anonymous because he or she did not wish to incur     the disrepute attached to novel-writers, declining to add his/her name to the work.
         Mr Taylor asserts that “no evidence suggests the letters are false” [Taylor, 183], perhaps because he is not a trained historian     (he is a maintenance man in an auto parts factory) and therefore lacks the skills necessary to assess adequately their reliability.     Most persons with a more-than-passing knowledge of mid-Tudor England could quickly spot the many errors contained in the     letters. The number and type of errors encountered make it indisputable that the letters are utter fiction. In the "letter" from Henry     Grey to Northumberland, for example, [Taylor, p. 18-20, “Lane Letter 86”] Grey addresses Northumberland as “My Lord     Protector." Northumberland was never styled “Lord Protector,” the office having been abolished upon Edward Seymour’s fall from     power in October 1549. Grey would never have addressed Northumberland by a title he did not hold.
         As a second example, many of the letters are supposedly to or from Jane’s “cousin” Lady Anne Grey. There were only three     Anne’s in the Grey family during Jane’s lifetime. One was her paternal aunt, born in about 1520. In a letter to Lady Laurana, the     supposed Lady Anne speaks of finding her father in perfect health. [Taylor, p. 150] The father of Jane’s aunt Lady Anne had died     when Anne was ten years old, more than twenty years before the letter was supposedly written. Jane’s aunt Anne therefore     cannot be the writer of the letters. A second "Lady Anne" was indeed Jane’s cousin and the daughter of John Grey of Pirgo. That     later Anne, however, was born no earlier than the mid-1540s, making her no more than ten years old when the alleged letters     were written and thus too young to be Jane’s correspondent. The only other Anne Grey known during Jane’s lifetime was the wife     of John, Baron Hussey. This last Anne had herself died in 1547, again before the letters were supposedly written. It is thus easily     discoverable that the “Lady Anne Grey” of the novel is unquestionably a fictitious character, though one perhaps based on a     genuine historical person.
         Read Mr Taylor's this book for what it is: a compilation of mostly fictional documents that take Jane Grey as their subject.     But for legitimate ("real") history, look elsewhere. This book is, in my opinion, a perfect example of why amateur historians and     sloppy publishers should never be brought together. Far from clarifying any unresolved issues regarding the history of Lady Jane     Grey, this work instead obscures the discernible truth with an overlay of fictional mud that leaves readers completely misinformed     and confused and legitimate historians and history teachers scrambling to pick up the pieces.

Zahl, Paul F.M. Five Women of the English Reformation. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing      Company, 2001.
         Mr Zahl is a former minister, and his purpose is religious inspiration. This volume is very brief, and simply repeats the work of      others.

HOME

Updated 20 March 2007
Copyright © 2007, J. Stephan Edwards
May not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of the author.